IDOR scanner for modern apps and APIs
IDOR flaws are among the fastest ways to expose customer data in production. BreachFound helps teams run a focused first-pass scan for object-level authorization issues before launch, enterprise review, or a larger manual pentest.
What IDOR means in practice
IDOR, or insecure direct object reference, is what happens when an application exposes internal identifiers without enforcing proper object-level authorization.
In practice, one authenticated user can request or modify another user’s resource simply by changing an identifier in a URL, request body, or API parameter.
Why IDOR is dangerous for SaaS and APIs
IDOR issues often lead directly to customer data exposure, cross-tenant access, or unauthorized actions in billing, account, support, or admin flows.
For startup products, this category matters because it creates immediate trust, compliance, and sales risk long before a full platform security program is in place.
- Customer record exposure
- Cross-account data access
- Unauthorized updates or exports
- Enterprise review blockers
Common places IDOR appears
IDOR patterns often show up in profile endpoints, document exports, billing APIs, support tools, internal admin routes, and any feature where resource IDs are passed directly between client and server.
- User profile or account routes
- Invoice, billing, or export endpoints
- Customer support dashboards
- File download and object storage access
What BreachFound checks
BreachFound is positioned as a low-cost first-pass scan for auth and access-control risk. It helps teams identify whether object-level authorization failures may exist in the tested app or API surface.
If findings matter, teams can unlock the technical report and use it to decide whether broader manual testing is needed.
What automated IDOR scanning cannot prove
No automated workflow replaces every human review path. Deep business-logic abuse, highly contextual authorization chains, or source-level ownership reasoning can still require manual testing.
When to use BreachFound vs a manual pentest
Use BreachFound when you need a fast first pass before launch, customer due diligence, or a broader purchasing decision. Use a manual pentest when you need deep business-logic review, broad adversarial testing, or formal assurance.
FAQ
Is this only for public APIs?
No. IDOR flaws can exist in web apps, internal dashboards, customer portals, and API-first products. The important factor is whether object identifiers are exposed without strong authorization checks.
Can a cheap first-pass scan still be useful for IDOR?
Yes. It is often a strong early filter before launch or enterprise review. The point is to catch obvious and high-impact access-control issues sooner, then escalate if the risk profile requires deeper manual work.
Does this replace a full broken access control review?
No. It helps you reduce uncertainty quickly, but broader authorization design review can still require human-led testing.
Use BreachFound to reduce uncertainty before launch or review.
Start with a focused first-pass scan, then decide whether to unlock findings or go deeper with broader manual testing.
Start Scan